If you know of examples of some interest for others, please feel free to mail them to us. They will be displayed on our website as anonymously as those already published.
Our idea in these documents is NOT to target anyone, but on the contrary to bring to your knowledge some interesting cases which may prevent you to duplicate the same mistakes while performing Penetrant Testing (PT) or Magnetic Testing (MT).
All the ministories you will read are TRUE. We think they will be helpful:
-
-
-
One's experience may help others. In addition any interesting problem met during audits may also help: auditors, who sometimes face incredible situations and have hard times, as well as auditees may have very useful pieces of information
We thank you in advance for any input.
- PT -
OLD TIMES - PT IN RNR OL’DAYS
- REPLACING PENETRANTS
- HOW TO "REJUVENATE" A HUGE QUANTITY OF PENETRANT!
- ENGINEERING MISHAPS
- A DYE-
FREE HYDROPHILIC EMULSIFIER - A WASHED-
DOWN JULY 14TH! - WHEN A 50 € (35 £, 75 $) QUOTATION BECOMES A 1.5 MILLION € (1.05 M£, 2.25 M$) EXPENSE.
- A DECEITFUL CUSTOMER
- UNINTENDED SULPHUR POLLUTION OF PENETRANT TESTING MATERIALS
- CERTIFICATES OF HALOGENS AND SULPHUR ANALYSIS
- WHEN A PRODUCT CONTAINING 65% CHLORINE IS SUPPLIED WITH A CERTIFICATE "LESS THAN 200 ppm’’ (i.e. LESS THAN 0.02%)
- AND YET THEY DID IT! (1)
- A POLLUTED DRY DEVELOPER
- A PENETRANT WHICH RETRACTS ON PARTS
- PENETRANT TESTING: A NEW DEVELOPER
- MAGNETIC TESTING: A "PRODUCT MODIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER, FOR SURE"
